Bedford Borough Council draft Allocations and Designations plan has been published for consultation up to 13 July 2010. The council is keen to hear your views on the draft proposals. Comments should relate only to valid planning matters. Other matters cannot be taken into account by the council when preparing the plan.
For more information on what is and what isn't a valid planning matter, please click here.
We own a site in Riseley on which we would like to build the Riseley Eco House, but at the moment it is designated as a Village Open Space and development will not be permitted on land designated as a Village Open Space.
For more information on what is and what isn't a valid planning matter, please click here.
We own a site in Riseley on which we would like to build the Riseley Eco House, but at the moment it is designated as a Village Open Space and development will not be permitted on land designated as a Village Open Space.
The Short Cut:
Please use the reply form below to let Paul Rowland, Assistant Director (Planning and Housing) Bedford Borough Council know that Riseley Site G, site no 29 adj 156 High Street does not fulfil the criteria which the council have used to justify its designation
“E the open space assists the transition between village and countryside providing a soft edge to the village which is pleasing visually”
“E the open space assists the transition between village and countryside providing a soft edge to the village which is pleasing visually”
and therefore should not be designated as a Village Open Space.
The Longer Way:
Please read through the following notes and then use the reply form below to let Paul Rowland, Assistant Director (Planning and Housing) Bedford Borough Council know that Riseley Site G, site no 29 adj 156 High Street does not fulfil the criteria E which the council have used to justify its designation and therefore should not be designated as a Village Open Space.
The Notes:
Bedford Borough Council have identified open spaces as village open spaces/views where they meet one or more of the following five criteria:
Village Open Spaces Criteria A to E page 112
·
A they are publicly accessible and valuable to the local community for sport, recreation or as amenity space
A they are publicly accessible and valuable to the local community for sport, recreation or as amenity space
· B they give identity to settlement or village by helping to retain its form and reflect past history (examples include village greens)
· C they provide a gap or break in the frontage which contributes to the character of a settlement for example by providing a view into a village which forms part of the village setting or a view into open countryside establishing the relationship between the form of the village and the countryside beyond.
· D the gap provides visual relief in an otherwise built up area punctuating the street scene
· E the open space assists the transition between village and countryside providing a soft edge to the village which is pleasing visually
Our site is called “Riseley Site G, Site no 29 Adjacent 156 High St” and is behind the trees on the left in the photo. It is designated as a Village Open Space only on one of the 5 possible criteria namely “E the open space assists the transition between village and countryside providing a soft edge to the village which is pleasing visually”
Village Open Spaces Riseley – site G page 6
We reject the premise that the site assists the transition between village and countryside, providing a soft edge to the village which is pleasing visually
The space in question is not at the end of the village and therefore does not provide a transition – there are 6 house, Margaret Beaufort Middle School and the caretaker’s bungalow before you reach open countryside on the same side of the road. On the opposite side of the road there is a small estate (Hunter’s Yard), 7 houses and a petrol station.
We would not in any case alter the tree line at the side of the road and would use the existing field gateway to gain access to the site and the proposed Riseley Eco House. The site is 1.6 metres above the High Street and provides very limited views, even in winter when the trees are not in leaf. There is no public access to the site. A public footpath runs along one side of the site, but again, has limited views because of hedges on both sides. It should be noted that the council admits that the site for the Riseley Eco House would “be easily incorporated into the existing settlement pattern of the village”.
It will help us if you contact Paul Rowland, Assistant Director (Planning and Housing) using the response form which can be sent “Freepost”. It is essential to address planning issues ie that the site should not be designated as a village open space and not just plead the case for the Riseley Eco House.
Thank you for your support
This consultation is now closed but if you have any comments we will be pleased to have them
George and Sue Davies July 2010